Digital Newspapers: stuck at page one?
It is very early to judge where the digital newspaper will be heading in the future, but the start has been somewhat turbulent and many changes are needed to bring it to the masses. There are multiple areas that need tweaking so let’s have a look at each-
Pricing
The Times has had some problems so far, in particular with the quality of the iPad offering, and this has resulted in 2 free months of subscription to early purchasers. In defense of it I must say that I never had a single problem and that it was the single most used app on my iPad while I had it. The layout was well thought out, the content excellent and overall I felt it was value for money. The problem is that not too many feel the same way I do.
At the same time the main website was pushed behind a paywall and users had to start buying a subscription to view the daily content. The price is £2 / week or £1 for a 24 hour pass and again the presentation is excellent. I do feel that this represents good value, but early reports suggest that almost 90% of its online readership has disappeared over night. Financially this is not a problem because more than £1 million will be generated each year on the above figures, but I would have thought that online newspaper sites should be designed to bring in more newspaper readers and not to push them away.
It’s going to take some time for people to adapt to the idea of paying for online content because the idea of a free internet is still very much an overriding state of mind. Apps, like the iPad options, should do better, but initial figures suggest that people are struggling with the concept here as well.
It’s not there
The fact that there is no paper involved means that buyers are not getting anything physical for their money. This is still a concern for some music buyers who want the CD, film buyers who want the DVD and book buyers who want a book to hold. We are a long way down the road in digital music and still there are many who want the physical product so a long road needs to be travelled for newspapers to reach out to the majority.
A dwindling industry
The fact is that newspaper readership has been dwindling for some time because of the Internet, Satellite TV and many other competing factors. We lead busier lives and the time available for content consumption has reduced over the past decade. This should offer the digital newspaper a slim advantage over the paper version, but you still need to spend time reading it to enjoy it. Making a dwindling industry digital will not make it grow- it just makes it digital.
I personally think there is a future for digital newspapers, and potentially a very big one, but we will have to wait sometime longer for the readership to match the potential.










I fall into the camp of wanting something physical for my money.
When you buy these things, I would worry about not being able to backup; as at some point the device or media may fail and you purchase is lost. And then of course, there is the potential limitation of not being able to transfer the content from one device to the next.
At least a DVD or CD can be converted to suit your desired playback unit. Can DRM content offer the same flexability in all cases?
I’ve had a few teething problems with PressDisplay (dealt with very well by their support btw). Newspapers can be pricier this way (paying separately for each part of the paper so it’s expensive if you want the lot) but actually they are one thing I don’t mind not have a backup for. A normal paper is disposable/recycleable so it’s no different for me, except I don’t have something to use when the kids want to paint.
You cannot wrap fish with a digital newspaper.
Leave your response!
Categories
PDair
Pipe Tool
Farkle
Fruit Salad
Piel Frama
Smart Box Design
Mastersoft
Clove Technology
User
Twitter
Archives
Tags