Orange San Francisco Review

The fact that Android is available to anyone to use it as an operating system on their products is without doubt beneficial because it greatly increases the number of devices that can run the software. However, my recent experience with the Next Tablet highlights a potential problem in terms of the type of products that can be developed under the ‘Android’ umbrella. If a succession of poor hardware is released it can only devalue the brand and turn away potential new customers who have had a bad experience.

The smartphone market of today is dominated by Symbian (Nokia), BlackBerry (RIM) and iPhone (Apple). One operating system per company and one company per operating system. Of course Android is quickly gaming market share and will likely be the leader one day, but at what price? You know what you are getting when you buy an iPhone, BlackBerry or Symbian device (good and bad) and the control is what makes these phones, on the whole, consistent and reliable.

Android is fragmented in so many ways; from the multiple devices available to the number of OS versions the current crop of phones run. It is confusing for hardened smartphone obsessives like me and I expect even more confusing for most users. To be fair though most users of Android smartphones do not care what version of Android their phone is running, if they even know it is running Android, and so their expectations do not have far to fall if the product isn’t as good as the competition.

Android has been proved to be a highly capable smartphone operating system and the Samsung Galaxy Tab and HTC Desire are just two examples of hardware that run the OS as it was intended to be. The debate is open as to Android tablets and if manufacturers should all wait for version 3 before they commit to making products that offer as good as experience as is found in the aforementioned phones. The debate is also open regarding the potential damage budget Android products will do to the reputation of the platform and the Orange San Francisco (stupid name) would appear to be the perfect example of a budget Android handset that has the potential to inflict further damage.

This phone is £99 without a contract, but boasts a specification list that seems inconceivable at such a price point-

Android 2.1 Eclair OS
3 Megapixel Rear Camera
FM Radio
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
3G+ Connectivity
150 MB Internal Memory
2 GB Pre-loaded MicroSD Card
MicroSD Card Slot Expandable Up To 32 GB
USB Port
POP3/IMAP 4 Email Supported
Orange Maps, Messenger, App Store And Orange Wednesdays

After some digging, I found out that the processor is running at 600 Mhz which is on the limit of what is needed to power Eclair. However, the Motorola FLIPOUT, Acer Liquid, Motorola Milestone XT720 and Sony Ericsson X10 Mini pack processors ranging from 600 Mhz to 720 Mhz so this is not that unusual.

It would be easy for me to continually consider the low price point of the San Francisco (stupid name) throughout this review, but I am not going to do that. Whether a smartphone is £99 or £399 it still needs to function as a smartphone and so I will put the price to the back of my mind for the time being.

In the box

As you would expect there is not a lot in the box, but then again you get an AC charger, USB cable and headphones. The charger is unusual in that you get the standard 3 pin plug (which looks like something from the 1970’s by the way) which has a short lead coming out of it with a female USB jack at the end. This potentially can be used for any device you charge with a USB lead and is a nice touch.

The headphones feel cheap and nasty with very thin wires and an design reminiscent of the older HTC style. The media volume with the supplied headphone is quite quiet and no amount of tinkering could make them louder which is a shame because the sound quality was way above expectations. I tried my iPhone headphones and they were even quieter with some interference so I will continue to test and update more on this part tomorrow.

I connected the San Francisco (stupid name) to my Mac Mini and everything worked immediately. iPhoto popped up and the SD card was available in Finder for copying music and video to. This sounds basic, but this has not always been my experience and I have encountered many problems on past devices in this area.

Overall I am fairly happy with the box contents which are rounded off by a superbly written 135 page manual and an equally as good introduction to Orange booklet.

First Impressions

The phone is very light at only 130 grams and the depth is a mere 11.8 mm. These would normally contribute to the feeling of a cheap phone that feels like a budget offering, but it is very well built indeed. There are no creaks or movement when you hold it and I would go as far as to say it is not unlike the HTC Desire to look at or to hold. The styling is a little bland on the back and somewhat dated, but the front offers a sleek slab-like appearance that belies the asking price. It really is very enjoyable to hold.

Below the screen are 3 buttons; home, menu and back which, despite their small size, work quite well. I have so far not had any problem hitting the keys I need when in a hurry. On the top left you have a microUSB which is of course a silly place to put it and along the top are the 3.5 mm headphone jack and power button. To the right are two large silver volume buttons and that’s your lot. There is no dedicated camera button and only one speaker on the right.

I expected bad things after inserting the SIM card and battery, but got another surprise when the screen lit up. The 3.5” screen (which I believe is OLED) looks great thanks to the 480 x 800 pixel resolution and it works outdoors in all conditions I have tried so far. It is a bit of a fingerprint magnet and somewhat reflective in specific conditions, but nothing an anti-glare screen protector wouldn’t take care of. I would go as far as to say that this screen is better than the HTC Desire setup because it works in many more situations and is almost the same size (3.5” v 3.7”). It is also very responsive and every finger touch so far has been greeted with an immediate response which offers a quality experience right from the start.

The real story is in the features though and how well each of them works, so here goes.

Screen (9/10)

The screen is seriously good and offers a clear resolution in most lighting conditions. It is also viewable from obtuse angles and this is the part of the phone that has surprised me more than any other. It is highly responsive and is, I kid you not, one of the best smartphone screens I have used to date.

General Performance (9/10)

The 600 MHz processor is not hugely fast, but Android 2.1 is not hugely resource hungry either. I currently have many apps open at the same time and not once has the San Francisco slowed down at all. Video playback is smooth and everything I have thrown at it has been accepted with aplomb and it just keeps puffing along.

Call and signal quality (8/10)

This is going well so far. The in ear call quality is good and offers enough clarity to give some depth to the experience. Turn on the loudspeaker and it feels even deeper, as though the phone is 2 inches deep with a small sub-woofer hidden inside. Both suffer a little in terms of the maximum volume which could be higher, but in most situations the quality makes up for the volume.

I tested the signal alongside a BlackBerry Bold 9700 on Orange and the differences were almost imperceptible. To get close to a BlackBerry for signal performance is not easy and needless to say it captured a signal much better than my friend’s iPhone 3GS, also on Orange.

Camera (4/10)

Hmmm. 3 Megapixels is not a lot these days, but it can still produce a handy snapper if the process is quick enough. I managed to capture some half-decent shots with concentration, but the time it takes to take a picture and the fiddling about is a bit of a hassle. It isn’t dreadful, but is definitely a weak point.

The camcorder function is very poor though and suffers from motion blurring, poor sound capture and generally poor quality in low lighting. There is no flash on this phone so your options are limited.

Media (7/10)

Music quality is actually very good, but there is definitely a problem with the maximum volume setting. I have now tried 4 sets of headphones and I could not attain a volume I was happy with. Admittedly I tend to ‘blast’ out my music at a very high level, but suspect that many will find this slightly annoying. This is not a problem that just affects the San Francisco because I have seen this issue on a few Android smartphones so far. There are hacks you can try to up the volume, but with a bit of luck Orange will come up with a software solution for this.

The external speaker is reasonably clear and offers enough clarity for showing video clips to friends, but again the volume is slightly too quiet.

Video playback is excellent and every clip I have tried played flawlessly. I was concerned that the processor would struggle, but so far there has been no evidence of that.

Battery (7/10)

This is a difficult one to judge so far, but it is just about acceptable. Orange quotes 4 hours of talk time and 9 days of standby which is pushing it in my opinion (how unlike a mobile manufacturer to overstate battery life). It has required a charge once a day so far and this is not unusual for most smartphones. The charging appears to be exceptionally fast though- attached to the AC adaptor it went from 15% to 85% in 20 minutes. This is, however, an area I will always mark down unless I can count battery performance in days.

Connectivity (8/10)

3G+ (HSDPA) is supported alongside Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR and GPS. An FM radio is thrown in for good measure which you will not be surprised to hear is very poor. In my tests Wi-Fi worked perfectly and connected almost immediately every time and the 3G performance in a good signal area was also well above expectations.

Software (8/10)

Orange, as usual, can’t resist bundling its own apps into the OS, but this time some of them are actually quite useful and do not ruin the performance of the phone.

Noteworthy additions include Orange Maps which offers street maps, turn-by-turn directions and more if you decide to subscribe to the professional version for £2.50 / month. The Orange App Shop is included which looks like a poor attempt at revenue generation when the Android Market is also present. Orange Photos is there alongside a couple of demo games; Who Wants To Be a Millionaire and Guitar Hero 5. A Global Time app makes an appearance with Orange Wednesdays in there for good measure. Add all of this to the copious selection of Android apps pre-loaded and you are spoilt for choice before you even touch the Android Market.

I was slightly concerned about the email integration until I realised that Microsoft Exchange is supported along with Workplace Connector, IMAP, POP and pre-loaded settings for 10 other major email providers. It would take me forever to discuss each app included, so I won’t, but I can confidently say that the selection included is more than complete and of good quality the whole way through.

Conclusion

At no point in this review, or when giving markings to each feature, have I offered extra marks because of the price of this phone. If something does not work, it is irrelevant how cheap it is- value for money starts with a working product first and your wallet second.

It would be hard to underestimate the importance of the Orange San Francisco. It is a very well built smartphone that includes almost all of the high-end features you would expect from a smartphone in late 2010. The camera is poor and the overall volume needs a tweak, but who would have thought that there would come a time so quickly when a smartphone with HSDPA, Wi-Fi, WVGA OLED screen, Android 2.1, GPS and so much more could be bought for under £100. Even more important is the fact that it all works together so well. There is absolutely no way that Orange can be making a profit on this phone at this price.

If this phone was £249 I wouldn’t consider it overpriced and it really isn’t far away from the HTC Desire. It is astonishing value for money and, believe it or not, one of the best Android smartphones I have tested to date. It is better than the Motorola FLIPOUT, the Xperia X10 Mini and the HTC Wildfire. It is £99.

Available from www.orange.co.uk for £99 + £10 top-up.

Bookmark the permalink.

29 Responses to Orange San Francisco Review

  1. gavinfabl says:

    This is a great phone with a poor camera but value for money is amazing.

    This is actually a ZTE Blade. For less than £4 you can unlock the sim. Custom roms are now available to remove the orange stuff as well.

    An even better bargain !

  2. eMorgan says:

    That’s a trip to my local Orange shop at lunchtime then:)

  3. JeoffK says:

    If it’s unlockable I am tempted. I use Vodafone and this would be a great starter Android phone for me. Still using a Palm Treo!

  4. gavinfabl says:

    It’s not unlockable at the orange shop or store. But a quick search on zte blade android modaco will reveal
    all.

  5. Kell says:

    My Orange shop had one in stock. It now has none! Will post my thoughts later:)

  6. Austin says:

    Picked one up yesterday from the Orange shop in Sheffield. Much better than the Hero I bought to replace my iPhone 3GS.

    So far, only problems I’ve noticed that haven’t already been pointed out are:
    - very poor battery life
    - screen doesn’t have an oleophobic coating so finger smears are very obvious

  7. Shaun says:

    So far, only problems I’ve noticed that haven’t already been pointed out are:
    - very poor battery life
    - screen doesn’t have an oleophobic coating so finger smears are very obvious

    I did mention the fingerprints- “It is a bit of a fingerprint magnet and somewhat reflective in specific conditions, but nothing an anti-glare screen protector wouldn’t take care of.”

    Re the battery, I noticed a big improvement after about 3 charges- the first two were quite shallow.

  8. Austin says:

    It’s a tricky thing to describe fingerprints on a screen… The Hero and the iPhone are fingerprint magnets too, but the coating stops the smears from ‘distorting’ the image.

  9. Kell says:

    Shaun. Your review is spot on! The screen is amazing for the price and it is really, really quick. I will play with it more later tonight but at the moment I can’t believe I spent less than £100 on this. Thanks for the push!

  10. Dave says:

    My first android phone, love it, but camera isnt very good and i am not happy with the battery life.If you like playing with apps expect to charge this phone twice or more in a day.Still very happpy with the amount of phone for £99 though !!!

  11. Mike says:

    Does opera mini work on this phone or does it have its own browswer that is as good/fast (or better/faster)?

  12. will says:

    Sounds nice it’s my birthday very soon and will hopefully get it

  13. sav says:

    Iv’e got a samsung omnia i900 (6 for £1.65 on ebay) on my SF screen while its not a perfect fit it is however very Nearly perfect fit and doest need to be adjusted in any way (ie. cutting to size)

    It has deffo helped with the fingerprints although still visible in certain light its so much easier to just wipe them away with a sleeve whereas the naked oled screen does tend to get very sticky/tacky sometimes needing a damp cloth to clean…The i900 protectors DO appear to be coated and does say on the pack ‘reduces glare & fingerprints’

  14. anthony stephenson says:

    Here’s my feedback after having the phone for a couple of weeks:

    CONS:
    Had problem getting my Microsoft Exchange email set up (I believe some other SF users have had the same problem – I have also heard some Galaxy S users have the problem too, so maybe an Android software problem rather than the hardware). Gmail and hotmail access were ok.

    Camera and video is very poor (i.e. video shot on the phone is poor – video viewed from other sources such as youtube looks great).

    PROS:
    Everything else!
    This really is an excellent handset. OK, if you have an iPhone, then the SF screen is not as good as iPhones retina display and it has a slightly slower processor (although I did not really find this problematic) and the pinch-and-zoom is not quite as smooth (but it is perfectly servicable).
    Don’t be put off by the fact this handset does not have a “brand” name like Samsung or Motorola….. this is truly exceptional for the price – to get something similar you would really need to spend at least £200.
    the bulid quality is excellent and the plastic has an odd rubbery tactile feel to it which is quite pleasant.
    It doesn’t handle BBC iPlayer, but you can download an app from the Android marketplace called myplayer that works some magic and gets you access to the iplayer stuff to stream or download (I tested it and it works very well).

    If you are looking for your first touchscreen or Android handset, then this is the one to go and get.

  15. Pingback: Orange San Francisco thoughts | PDA-247

  16. Pat says:

    Have to agree with everyone else about this handset, it still seems too good to be true. I’ve been waiting what feels like forever for an Android device to come under 100 pounds with a decent review and this seems to wipe the floor with the competition at the moment.

    The screen display is stunning. I’ve been looking at photos and videos loaded from my PC that had good resolution and they are vivid and crystal clear. I’m a complete novice when it comes to Android but after 5 days ownership I’m finding my way around quite easily. So much so, having to use my PC tonight I was screaming at Windows to finish booting up so can see the San Francisco taking over much of my online needs.

    Having held onto a mobile that is a few years old – so from the ark in technology terms – I even find the camera good enough for what I want.

    Followed links tonight to unlock the phone which worked first time, so even happier that I can carry over my old service. I can’t see why anyone would be disappointed with this handset at this price. Thanks PDA-247 for the review!

  17. Isla says:

    This phone looks really good and i cant wait to get it for xmas, just wondering if apps are free? and if not how much do they cost? do u get free internet on msn messenger?
    thanks

  18. Peter says:

    I bought one last Thursday. You can get the phone for £39 if you buy a readyplan 120 (12 months X £10 monthly PAYG top up) which I think is good value as no need to bother about top ups for 12 months. You get 300 free texts and 100MB internet per month for this top up. I was told by sales chap that it has 500MB internet and I am checking this as 100B is a bit low.
    It has good Wifi connections, I downloaded Opera from Android Market and it does work OK on this phone.

  19. Pingback: Orange San Francisco down to £84.15 + £10 top up | PDA-247

  20. Pingback: 2010: The year mobile came of age | PDA-247

  21. Paul says:

    The touch screen completely died on mine after a few hours… so I’m taking it back tomorrow.

    I think the price is a little too good to be true…

  22. anthony stephenson says:

    Sorry to hear Paul had a dud.
    Sounds like an unfortunate one-off though.
    Have had mine for a few months now and it has been fab.
    Not recommended if you need high quality photos or video recording, but meets expectations for its price point.
    The Exchange email function is also a bit rubbish, but i downloaded Touchdown from Android market and it works a treat.
    Further to my earlier posting, the myplayer software does not now support iplayer (legal reasons). However if you have the old version it should still stream (but not download).
    Overall though, the phone has been a stunning bargain.
    Still VERY highly recommended.

  23. anthony stephenson says:

    p.s. it is WELL worth downloadind Opera from Android market. it is so much quicker than the phone’s stock browser and you’ll notice the pinch-and-zoom becomes a lot quicker and smoother (closer to that on the iphone).

  24. Rob Jones says:

    I had one for Christmas and yes I find the phone great agree with camera being a bit iffy.

    Has been working fine but now the touchscreen has packed in so I too will be taking it back!

  25. Ann Brocklehurst says:

    Bought a San Francisco because I wanted to download Radio 4 programmes to listen to on the train. Have I bought the right product and if so how do I it. Thanks.

  26. Venty says:

    In Switzerland it is sold by OK k.kiosk AG at their newspaper stands for CHF 100.– plus a CHF 15.– pre-payed SIM card for the Orange network. And yes, this is a bargain in Switzerland too for such a great device.

    The swiss version has a black glossy back cover without the Orange logo. The rest is the same.

  27. David says:

    I have had a very bad experience with this phone on two levels.
    Firstly I have had four replacements now. With each phone experiencing the same problem, with the operations of the phone gradually getting slower and slower. I eventually had a member of Orange call staff admit that sometimes they get a batch of poor phones.
    Secondly I have found Orange’s customer care to be appalling.
    - Call staff giving false names and extension numbers.
    - Call staff promising to call back but never doing so.
    - Hours spent having to call the support centre being passed between departments.
    - Being treated like I was being difficult in expecting to have a phone that worked.
    - The response from Orange is that they will keep sending me replacements until either the problems disappear (read: “disappears for long enough that I am no longer covered by a warranty”).
    Clearly some people have been lucky with this phone given the good reviews. However after this experience I can only question my decision to buy the phone and mostly buying from Orange.

  28. Anthony says:

    Hi David.

    Wow, sounds like you have had really bad luck with several units going wrong.
    I’m guessing it must be at batch issue, as I have been lucky enough to have had mine working ok for a good few months now.

    As my phone works, I’m loving it, but I have to agree with you about Orange’s customer service.

    Orange service in-store is very poor (once you’ve bought a phone, they really aren’t bothered about aftercare and can be spectacularly rude…. Orange store Slough, that’s you I’m talking about).
    As for Orange’s online customer care…. truly appalling!
    Assuming you can navigate through the million phone menus and find the secret code that can eventually connect you to a human being, you still won’t get much help from them….. incredibly poor.

    However, if you are lucky enough to get a phone that works and don’t require much in the way of aftersales support, their network service is pretty ok.

  29. Chris Davies says:

    I am 68 years old – my first mobile phone was a Nokia Orange (Nokia 2140) delivered to me on April 1st 1993 – the day Orange (Hutchison Whampoa) first stated.I’ve had a variety of phone since then and my current carry-about general use mobile is a Sony Ericsson W810i – whch I luv – but no proper internet.So after reading the reviews I bought my first Smartphone – the San Francisco (they could have called it the San Mateo that is much more up market :-0 ).
    Anyway I have been delighted with this especially the GPs function with Google maps etc…and have a lot of other (freebie) apps including AVG antivirus amongst others.All round I think it is superb (and maybe will spoil me for other phones.At this price the San Francisco is definitely the “first” Smartphone to buy and especially it is suitable for pensioners on a budget.And yes I am on Facebook and Twitter!The first version of Windows I used was v3.1 – Oh, all those years ago!