Category Archives: Reviews: Hardware

Palm Pre 2 review: hardware

Available from Clove for £342

Highlights-

* webOS 2.0 platform
* True Multitasking
* 3.1″ multitouch screen
* Slide-out 4-row QWERTY keyboard
* Just Type
* HP Synergy for cloud back up
* Cut, Copy & Paste feature
* Set-up up to 16 Exchange Server email accounts
* Over 3000 Apps available
* 3.5mm headphone jack
* 16GB internal storage

The Palm Pre 2 is a curious device. It is following in the footsteps of the original Palm Pres which failed to set the smartphone world alight and is preceding the much anticipated Pre3. This puts the Pre 2 in a position that no company should ever put one of its products in. HP was so determined to demonstrate its strategy for the year ahead that it has ended up making the Pre 2 look like the last of the original bunch and not a patch on what is to come. I don’t understand why this phone has been released at all, or at least I didn’t until I used it for a few days.

My experience with webOS is much less than with any other mobile operating system and has consisted of a few hours here and there which never gave me a true insight into what the operating was about. This is my chance to look at webOS as much as the Pre 2 and the results have been unexpected on so many levels. Let’s start with the hardware-

Picking up the Pre 2 for the first time felt like I had jumped back in time to the pre-iPhone era. There is little doubt that this is a Palm designed product because every aspect from the box through to the accessories to the phone itself screams Palm. The small touches of cuteness are everywhere and while I don’t appreciate them all, they are unique in a market dominated by large screen slabs of uber technology, most of which look the same.

The stubbiness of the Pre 2 is hard to ignore on the first day of use and I have no qualms in saying that I hated the shape of it. It just didn’t feel like a phone at all; too small height and width wise and too deep. It resembles a pocket radio from the early 1980’s and has almost no sharp angles at all. However, over the past few days I have grown to like the form of the phone and found it to be quite natural to pick up and use. It’s a nice feeling to be clicking open a keyboard again when I get a call or a new email arrives- some don’t like this action and find it cumbersome, but I see it as making the Pre 2 feel more like a real phone than the touch screen only rivals it is trying hard to compete with. It also feels more natural to hold and I have quickly become accustomed to the form which has shown me that there is life outside of touch once more.

In the box

Everything from the main charger with its quirky adaptor to the USB cable with the clever binder screams of innovation and carefulness of thought. Even the documentation is cute and the box is very similar to the Centro efforts from years ago. The headphones are not great, but feel free to find me a manufacturer who bundles decent headphones with their smartphones.

Second impressions

I won’t do first impressions because they were not very good and will instead concentrate on how I have found the hardware after prolonged use. It’s pretty good all round barring one major problem. The external speaker has a deep and rounded sound and the screen works very well in all conditions. I don’t like the size of the screen because it hampers many tasks that would work so much better on a larger screen. Despite my preference for real keyboards I would love to see webOS running on a larger touch screen device. I believe that this would show people what the OS is really like and enable them to compare it with iOS, Android and the rest. At the moment the hardware is too different for many people to see past and they often fail to get past the first hurdle.

I have to say that the biggest hurdle is the keyboard which is exceptionally small and far too difficult to use. It is a throwback to Palm design from the past where there was always an inconvenience built in. On the Treo 650 it was the lack of dynamic memory, the Treo 680 had an appalling battery, the Centro had a tiny keyboard and the Treo Pro was just crap all round. The Pre 2 keyboard suffers from the keys being too small, too close together, too close to the bottom of the screen and even the key legends are not always centred. It is a bizarre series of data entry compromises on a phone that is designed to communicate. On the plus side it feels perfectly weighted and comfortable in the hand, but that is a shallow plus indeed.

The mirror on the back is almost as crazy as the keyboard design. With no sexist intent at all, is this phone only designed for women? How many men do you know that want a mirror on their smartphone? I don’t need a mirror on a phone to tell me that I have lost my hair and that I have gotten fatter recently. I need a mirror on the wall because I have gotten fatter recently and the Pre 2 mirror is too small for my fat face. You could argue that the mirror is not seen when in use, but everyone else can see you talking into a mirror when you are on a call. Strange indeed.

So it’s not good is it? I will publish part two in a few days and explain why this is the second best phone I have ever used.



2 Comments


Nokia C3-01 review

Nokia continues to dominate certain areas of the mobile phone market and with very good reason. When I think of a standard Nokia mobile phone, I think of good build quality, reliability, easy to use software and general performance that the others often struggle to match. At first glance the Nokia C3-01 embodies all of the above with ease.

It is a beautiful looking phone with a large 2.4” and outsize keys that are larger than any other comparable Nokia S40 phone. It looks like a premium handset, but retails for under £100 and this makes me wonder why anyone would choose anything else. Of course the Orange San Francisco also retails below the £100 mark and there are a few smartphones that are priced similarly, but few match the C3-01 for the high quality materials used.

The main differentiator here is that a touch screen is included which is highly unusual in a candy bar phone and my initial conclusions were that it would be problematic to use. The BlackBerry Torch, even with its slide-out keyboard, didn’t feel quite right when using it to type and in my mind a front facing keyboard needs to be the full QWERTY style to work effectively. I couldn’t have been more wrong.

Symbian S40 is employed so you won’t need to scroll around the environment too much and my initial impressions were that the touch screen worked extremely well for choosing apps and general navigation. It gets a little trickier when scrolling lists of media because it seems to be pressure sensitive and this takes some getting used to. The shape of the phone and screen size also make the touch experience feel somewhat alien if you are used to something like the iPhone. This should not, however, detract from the way the touch screen has been implemented because it works very well and proves that it is perfectly possible to make a candy bar phone that is touch and type.

Connectivity is well catered for with HSDPA and Wi-Fi included alongside Bluetooth 2.1. The inclusion of Wi-Fi is unusual in an S40 phone, but I’m not going to complain. When browsing and checking emails etc. the HSDPA speeds were blazingly fast and I was more than impressed with the mobile data performance. There is a quirk though in that holding the phone at the bottom, or using it two-handed, can decrease the 3G and Wi-Fi signals markedly. It didn’t cause me to lose connection and the signal is excellent in normal use, but it shows that Nokia still continues to house the antennas in the bottom of the phone. There are also still some quirks in the software- I connected to my router and the Wi-Fi worked perfectly. All I needed to do then was turn the Wi-Fi off. Um, this proved to be problematic because I could not find a setting anywhere to do this and eventually ended up on Google where I found many others asking the same question. In the end I left it and it seemed to turn itself off although I’m still not entirely convinced.

Needless to say, the call quality is excellent and so is the loudspeaker which is one of the best I have ever heard. This is impressive when you consider how slim the phone is and puts paid to the argument that some high-end smartphones have weak external speakers because they are so thin. Music quality is also very good through the external speaker and offers a feeling of coming from places outside of the phone which is always a good trick to pull off.

The various apps included are as you would expect- alarm clock, calculator etc and a selection of games that work really well with the touch screen. It took me back to a time when sliding puzzles and simple word games were good fun, and in many ways they still are suited best to a smaller screen. Ovi Store is there so you can purchase a download from a wide range of (basic) apps and games, but let’s not kid ourselves and expect a full app experience under S40.

Surprisingly Ovi Maps is not present which I would have expected. Even on my wife’s Nokia, which is only £40 to buy, it can use Ovi Maps so why not here? I understand the lack of GPS, but it could still be offered using triangulation even if the ultimate solution isn’t 100% perfect. It’s not a huge problem of course, but I would expect a consumer phone priced under £100 to offer GPS before Wi-Fi. The camera is rated at 5 Megapixels, but doesn’t get close to that level of performance and I would place it at equivalent to what you would expect from a mid-range 3 Megapixel phone snapper.

Anyway, that one small blip is a personal want and not enough to detract my view of this phone. The battery is excellent and everything else is pure Nokia. Symbian S40 is really showing its age these days, but is still a competent and easy to use environment for most people and just about succeeds. The hardware is wonderful and the phone itself is a joy to use. With the usual high performing battery and call experience we expect from Nokia, I have no hesitation in recommending this phone as a back up for a smartphone or as a full-time caller. My wife liked it so much she is now using it as her main phone and has no intention of moving from it anytime soon. Even I pick it up now and again just to experience it and to enjoy the way it has been put together. Well done Nokia.

Comments Off

Google Nexus S review (part two, almost)

I have been in possession of the Nexus S for 10 days now which is longer than I normally get to test a smartphone. This has given me a much greater insight into its performance and the downsides of what is supposed to be the flagship Android phone of the moment. I have a problem though and it is an unusual one for me- I have found no problems at all with this phone so far which flies in the face of some feedback I have received from another Nexus S owner who has had multiple problems with his phone (expect a review from him soon).

These problems have also been discussed on other sites and it seems as though Samsung needs to work through some software niggles to make the Nexus S a reliable and consistent performer. The problems are varied and in some cases wide ranging yet I have not experienced any issues at all. I feel that I am more likely than most to experience problems with smartphones which I presume is down to my usage pattern; I am still having big signal problems with the iPhone 4, my BlackBerry Bold is still suffering from charging issues and my Orange San Francisco continues to struggle with Wi-Fi. The Nexus S suffers from no problems at all for me. Calling, signal, battery and all of the other practicalities have come over as above average for me and it’s all good so far.

I am not going to detail each feature of the Nexus S at this time because I have spent a lot of time pushing it hard to try to find problems. It is an odd way to undertake a review, but in some ways probably the best thing to do. The overall experience of using the Nexus S is quite simply brilliant and the screen dominates like no other phones I have used, apart from maybe the Desire HD. The difference here though is that it comes with the Samsung build quality and a sense that this is a ‘pure’ Android phone. When you start using a phone that offers Android in its default state you quickly realise that all of the bells and whistles thrown in by HTC, Samsung and the like on other phones are just that, bells and whistles. The beauty of Android is that you can do almost anything you want with it and the Nexus S is the best clean slate I have seen to date.

It’s so good that I will be buying one next week and will then complete the second part of the review, but this is a seriously impressive phone and shows to me that some Android phones have the potential to rival the iPhone, and that the battle will get harder as each month passes. I use the word ‘potential’ because I’m not quite ready to offload the iPhone yet.

Available from Clove for £459.60.

Comments Off


Google Nexus S Review (part one)

Available from www.clove.co.uk for £459.60

Google Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
Quad-Band GSM/GPRS
Tri-Band 3G/HSPA
WiFi 802.11 b/g/n
4.0″ WVGA Super AMOLED Capacitive Screen
16GB on board memory
5 Megapixel rear facing camera
Front facing VGA camera for video calls
1500mAh battery

Why is the Nexus S screen curved? I still haven’t worked out a reason for that particular design decision besides the sheer novelty of it, but I am sure there is some intelligent thinking behind it somewhere. It isn’t curved enough to sit more comfortably on your face when making a call and it isn’t curved enough to make any discernable difference in normal use. So why is it curved?!?

Anyway, now that we have ascertained that the curved screen doesn’t need to be curved what is the rest of the design like? I have to say that first impressions of the form factor and materials used are exceptionally good. It is dominated by black plastic which would normally be seen as a negative, but this use of the right shade and shine of plastic on the front means that it is difficult to see where the screen ends and the surround starts when the screen is on. That sounds like a simple trick, but it is mightily impressive when you first start using it.

The plastic body and sensitive use of curves also make the phone feel smaller than it is which is clever when you consider that the 4.0” screen is a bit of a beast in mobile terms. Next to an iPhone 4 it looks significantly larger, but in the hand does not feel so. This makes me wonder if manufacturers like Samsung use plastic to keep down weight, improve build quality and make a device ‘feel’ smaller. The argument that this makes a device look cheaper is valid, but the benefits can far outweigh the downsides.

There is a ridge at the bottom of the back that feels uncomfortable at first and dare I say unnecessary which I presume to be there for a specific reason. Besides housing specific components in the bottom there is a good balance to the Nexus. I test this by simply balancing a phone on one finger and seeing if it stays there- this one did. The keys below the screen are no longer buttons and merely digital representations of functions that some do not like. I get that some like buttons, but can live with virtual buttons below the screen for commonly used functions. It’s a bit silly to complain about a lack of buttons on a phone that is almost 100% driven by a touch screen. The good news is that the on/off button is housed on the right and not the top which is a much more logical place for it and the volume buttons complete the interface. The only omission I can see is the lack of a dedicated camera button which many phone do away with now which is a shame because this flies in the face of smartphones building in every more clever cameras. It’s all very well having a highly specified camera on board, but touch screens are far from ideal for taking photos without complications.

A screen as large as this one does make the entire Android interface feel less cluttered and when you consider that this particular phone is pure Android without all of the extra apps thrown in by other manufacturers it feels cleaner still. Android is a great operating system, but can suffer from an aesthetic overload when too much is installed by a manufacturer and the Nexus phones highlight how simple it can be to use in the first few days. You still get everything you need, but with all of the nonsense moved to one side which ultimately makes for a much better experience. It could be time for other manufacturers, including Samsung, to learn lessons from this. They won’t, however, because they are looking to create differences between their Android offerings compared to the rest and hardware is just one differentiator among many.

Over the first couple of days the performance (speed) has been excellent and I have suffered no stutters or freezing at all. It is powerfully specified and it seems as though the hardware and software work almost perfectly together to offer sublime performance. This is a high priced smartphone and my first impressions lead me to believe that the hardware reaches the standards you would hope for. In part two I will look in detail at the software, camera and all other aspects of what is supposed to be the flagship Android phone. It has been almost all good so far, but that kind of positivity rarely lasts throughout the whole of one of my reviews…

Comments Off

Samsung Wave II Review

Available from Clove for £319.20

Highlights-

Samsung Bada OS
3.7″ Super LCD Touch screen
HD Video Recorder
5MP Camera
DLNA Capability
Social Networking
‘Quicktype’ Technology

When I reviewed the original Samsung Wave back in June 2010 I was more than impressed with many aspects of the package. From the clarity of the screen to the general performance to the Bada OS, everything fitted together to create a phone that was different from the big players in the market and one that could potentially suite large swathes of the smartphone buying public.

With little fanfare, Bada OS phones have sold in huge numbers and now we have the Wave II to play with. This phone will not garner millions of web words and the kind of publicity Apple, HTC and the rest can muster up, but it has the potential to be the next sleeping giant in this market. It is almost a throwback in a world where pushing the limits of what is technically possible sells. A focus has been put on practicality and the overall experience and the lack of outward excitement could well be the main advantage of this handset, and indeed the Bada OS itself has a lot of impact on the user experience.

I haven’t used Bada since I sent the original Wave back so it will be interesting to see how much it has changed over the past year. I am hoping for some big changes because a first glance at the Wave II suggests very little has changed on the hardware side. The main hardware changes are-

The screen size has been increased from 3.3” to 3.7” and is now a Super Clear LCD rather than Super AMOLED.

Besides the above, the hardware changes are minimal- the processor is still rated at 1GHz, the camera is the same and so is almost every other specification within the Wave II. Near Field Communication has popped up on the specs sheet, but the rest of the changes will go largely unnoticed by the majority of users. At first glance there appears to be a serious lack of movement from the original Wave to the Wave II, but let’s take a look and see if subtle changes make for a big improvement.

In the box

One day I will write a review of a smartphone and say something like “You won’t believe what is in the box, it’s amazing!”, but not today. An AC charger, pair of in-ear headphones and… oh that’s it. Not even a synchronisation cable which leads me to believe that this is very much a consumer phone. It’s all the usual Samsung quality, but the overall package feels slightly stingy for a phone that costs more than £300.

First Impressions

Taking the Wave II out of the box and playing with it for 5 minutes felt like deja vu of the most intense nature. It is slightly larger than the original Wave, but besides that I struggle to see what is new here. Seeing Bada OS again is an entirely different experience to seeing it for the first time last June. That is not because the OS has changed dramatically, but because everything else outside of Bada has changed so much. I hate to say this, but all of a sudden it looks dated, incredibly dated. The square icons and lack of customisation on the home screen make it look more feature phone than smart phone. This is in contrast to a few months back when it looked like a competitor from the first second I tried it. I am not sure that this is wholly because of the way the OS looks or because I am so used to seeing small changes happen regularly on iOS, BlackBerry and Android, but somehow it is just too similar to the original to jump out from beneath the shadow of the original Wave.

The fact that the screen technology is now Super LCD rather than Super AMOLED may be the main reason for the release of the Wave II. With so few changes over the original I do wonder if the need to produce Super AMOLED screens for Android and Windows Phone devices is taking precedence and thus the Wave brand had to be pushed to the back of the AMOLED queue. I am merely hypothesising because I fail to see, on first impressions, why the Wave II deserves the title when it feels almost identical to the original.

As I played some more with the Wave II the positivity I felt with the first Wave started to flow back. It is hard to put into words, but this phone is wonderfully well built and every nook and cranny feels as if it was designed to work with the next nook. It comes together to produce a super feature phone rather than a smartphone and almost feels as if Samsung deliberately held back on the looks of the hardware and software to keep it in the feature phone niche that it would prefer the Wave to inhabit.

The cool feel of the metal housing and the perfectly weighted body make me want to hold the Wave II some more. It doesn’t jump out at me like the design aesthetics of the iPhone 4 or Nexus S do, but it gives me a sense of sophisticated build quality that is designed to help with life’s mobile needs.

I won’t be detailing my thoughts on each part of the Wave II like I usually do because so many features are identical to the original Wave so will concentrate on what is different.

Screen (9/10)

The use of Super LCD makes very little difference when compared to the Super AMOLED technology used on the original Wave. The viewing angles are very slightly reduced, but visibility in bright conditions and elsewhere is still excellent. It seems to me that the vast majority of people will notice no difference between Super LCD and Super AMOLED because they are both are the very high end of screens used in smartphones today.

Software (8/10)

Bada OS is not a smartphone operating system and makes no such claims. It is very much driven towards consumers who want a more flexible experience, but who still want the simplicity and stability that a feature phone brings. The most required apps are built in by default and these cover almost every conceivable need. The simplicity of the home screen belies the fact that there is a lot included, but it feels more accessible that a fully loaded Android smartphone. The regimented icon arrangement looks bland, but it does make for a much quicker learning process and you will soon find yourself jumping around the various apps without thinking about what you are doing.

You can add new apps via Samsung Apps which reminds me of the Android Market in the way it works. See an app, tap get and it will be delivered to the Wave home screen. The app number has also increased over time and I found a varied selection to choose from. For example, there are over 560 games, 348 entertainment items, 153 news apps, 87 productivity apps, 248 reference apps, 515 themes and 386 utilities. This, of course, isn’t a huge number in comparison to other app stores, but it goes back to the old argument of how many apps you really need. In some ways the lack of apps and the way in which they work offers a sense of order and bridges the gap between smart and feature phone perfectly.

Many firm mobile favourites are available such as Let’s Golf 2 HD and Sims 3 and the selection of games in particular feels complete enough for my usage. It’s not all great though because the GPS navigation options are limited. A 30 day trial is included, but it is built around the old Route 66 solution and does not offer the same level of usability we see in the better solutions from TomTom, ALK etc. It has a lot of features, which you will pay for, though and could be suitable for occasional use. Sadly Google Maps is missing, which is understandable, and this does leave Bada OS without a really good navigation solution.

And that really does sum up the main differences from the first Wave to Wave II, they are not overwhelming by any stretch of the imagination. The operating system has been updated, but only minimally, and there are various other tweaks here and these, but a look at my original Wave review will tell you almost all that you need to know about Wave II.

Conclusion

I still like Bada OS and the Samsung Wave a lot. Together they offer a refreshing alternative to the complex smartphones and inflexible feature phones, but with a price that is much closer to smartphone than feature phone. A quick look at the competition brings some worrying comparisons- the Orange San Francisco is £99 and many better quality smartphone are available at close to £300 so this should put the Wave II out of the running on price alone.

However, that would be to miss the thought process behind Bada OS and the Wave. It is not a smartphone in the way that smartphones are smartphones. That sounds silly because there is no true definition of a smartphone, but it just doesn’t feel like a smartphone. That’s not necessarily a bad thing because the Wave II is an exceptionally well built phone that offers 98% of what a smartphone can deliver. It is highly capable and almost feels as if Samsung has deliberately constrained its general appeal by making the OS look cartoony and overly swamped with bright colours.

The Wave II is as good as the original Wave and the extra screen size adds just a little to the overall enjoyment of this phone. The fact that the changes are minimal in this new version does not detract from my enjoyment of Bada OS and the Wave hardware. It is still a brilliant phone, but I would have liked to have seen some more changes in the sequel.


Comments Off


Acer Aspire One AOD260 review

So, the iPad found its way to eBay and was eventually sold for £20 less than I bought it for, and that is after postage and charges. It shows how popular the iPad is and how much some people will pay for a second-hand one, even in near perfect condition. On a side note, the price of second-hand Apple products never fails to amaze me- old iBooks regularly sell for over £300 and 3 year old Macbooks still garner between £400-500 on average. I considered going for an older Macbook for my mobile needs when I realised that my Son’s Netbook was near the end of its life, but eventually decided that a full-sized laptop was too big and a Macbook Air was far too expensive for what I needed.

Two hours and a mere £150 later I was in possesion of an Acer Aspire One AOD260 which I bought on a whim from eBay. It was brand new and had never left its box and after picking it up locally I started to have a play when I got home. I knew nothing about the device, but was down heartened by the price of Netbooks in general and refused to pay £300 for something that included Windows 7 Starter and that did not come with a long battery life and decent keyboard. In my ignorance I ended up buying a Netbook that has an excellent battery life, decent keyboard and a very good screen, but there is much more to this story.

Once I had spent the first hour removing anything with McAfee and Norton in the title (oh how I hate every product these two companies have ever made) and installed my most needed and best performing software; Firefox, Thunderbird, AbiWord and Paint.net I started to have a look around the system. For a start I realised that the battery runtime is much better than I expected with a projected life per charge of more than 5 hours. As I write this the meter states that there is 32% remaining which equates to 3 hours 17 minutes. This seems very high, but from what I have seen does not seem unreasonable and that is my first concern done with.

The keyboard is flush which is how I like them following months marvelling at how brilliant the standard Apple keyboards are these days. I was quickly bashing words out at a fair old clip and would rate is as the best Netbook keyboard I have used to date. The screen is none too shabby either and is above par, but bright sunlight could potentially be problematic. If I ever see the sun again, has been raining for days on end, I will update this review with a more conclusive opinion.

The design of the AOD260 is somewhat business-like and far from emotional, but the build quality feels strong and there is some personality to the etched covering that subtely covers the front, back and inside. I feel that little attention has been paid to making the AOD260 look like a consumer product, despite a range of available colours, but it is far from ugly and does exude an air of quality from almost every angle.

I wasn’t expecting much from Windows 7 Starter because of the limitations imposed around customisation and the media functions, but it really isn’t too cut down for a Netbook. Certain elements are removed such as DVD playback, which you are unlikely to want to do on a Netbook anyway, and the inability to customise the main wallpaper is by far the most noticeable change. You can easily get around the wallpaper issue though with a simple program or you can pay approximately £70 to upgrade to Windows 7 Home Premium. At this time I do not feel hampered enough to pay another £70 on the upgrade and I am still considering the possibility of loading up Mac OS to make my Netbook experience complete.

As I started to have a look around the system I noticed a familiar little green face on my desktop, the Android robot! In my ignorance I had never realised that the AOD260 comes with both Windows 7 Starter and Android which you can dual-boot as you wish. Android on a Netbook? Yes indeed and it’s there by default. Unfortunately version 1.5 in installed which is a bit of a downer as this takes away the options to install extra apps and all of the goodness of future Android versions. What it does offer, however, is instant-on and a surprisingly impressive experience. I expected it to feel like a budget Android tablet, but it actually felt as though it was built for a Netbook. I suspect that the limitations of the OS version are deliberate because of the compatibility of apps, but will take a look around to see if anyone has managed to make a later version run on the AOD260. If they have, and apps and games like Angry Birds and some of the more complex productivity solutions work, this could be a killer feature. As it stands it is a bit of a novelty that adds some curiosity to the product rather than an entire new operating system.

I need to spend some more time with this Netbook to really get underneath all of the features, but I can clearly say that I have been blown away by the quality, practicality and price of the AOD260 so far. My next purchase is a 3 MiFi to give me internet anywhere and then I should be all set. I loved the iPad and I dearly wanted a Macbook Air, but the realities of life meant that I still ended up with a device that cost me under £200 which is capable of almost everything I need to do when away from home.

UPDATE: Five days later and I am still waiting to charge the AOD260. It is amazing what a supposedly basic piece of technology can do when the form factor and the components work well together. I decided to buy a basic dongle from 3 for £31 (90 days mobile access @ 3GB) and my setup is complete. I am absolutely delighted by this device and never expected to be.

8 Comments

Amazon Kindle mini-review

On the subject of the Kindle, look what Murray has sent in…

eBooks. They’re going to kill reading, they’re going to be the saviour of reading and books and/or many other things that will probably never come true. One thing is fairly certain though….less trees will be felled in the years ahead and that surely must be an okay, at the very worst, thing?

I’ve been quite anti-eBooks in the past, not hugely anti in the sense that I view them as the great anti-Christ or anything along those lines but mainly because I always thought they represented less value in comparison to their printed counterparts.  My initial eBook foray experience being hugely soured by the awfulness that is eReader, Fictionwise and previous mobile apps on the likes of Palm Treos. The thought now makes me shudder of the hassle of buying books on these online stores and then trying to get them onto different mobile devices…yuk

Anyway, this is now 2011and several major innovations or switches in outlook have made it look like eBooks are now not only here to stay but here to expand. Exhibit number 1 being the Amazon Kindle which has grown from a fairly nice product into a fairly big player and is ably supported by its whole eco-system, this meaning Kindle apps being available for most of the major platforms (desktop and smartphone), the Kindle bookstore which now offers a lot of eBooks at mostly decent prices and a seamless (Apple-like) integration between the two. Buy a book via the Amazon web store and you can download it and read it on your iPhone, MacBook, Windows PC or wherever you can load the Kindle app to. Read it on your iPhone or Hero and then when you open your laptop at home the bookmark will have been synced to your PC so it opens on the last page read. Welcome to Smooth City……

So, having used and liked the Kindle app on my home mac and iPhone, certainly in preference to Apple’s iBooks alternative, and having received some Xmas Amazon vouchers I took the plunge and splashed out on a Kindle 3, the model that comes with the free 3G and wifi. I won’t bore you all with the specs or where the buttons are or what they do but instead I’ll just give some initial thoughts on the device, having now used it for almost a week. Overall, I really like it. The user experience, in terms of comparing it to the likes of Fictionwise and eReader, is on a different level. Buying books is easy once you have an Amazon account set up. When mine arrived and was opened up I was astonished to note that it was already called “Murray’s Kindle”……how did they do that? Not only that but it was already linked to my Amazon account.

Back to the user thoughts….my main gripe with the form factor is that both sides of the Kindle have largish buttons for getting to the next and previous pages. I assume this is to accommodate both left and right handed readers. Myself, being right-handed, would naturally use the buttons placed on the right hand side and at the same time would tend to hold the Kindle in my left hand, with my fingers holding, you’ve guessed it, the buttons on the left hand side with the direct result that for the first few days I was inadvertently pressing the page back and forward buttons when reading. I therefore have had to adjust the way that I hold it, which is a bit awkward as my fingers now have to sort of straddle the left hand side trying to avoid the buttons…not exactly natural but you get used to it. It’s also odd trying to get used to another non-touchscreended device and the initial temptation (and natural preference) is to try and use the screen for selecting menu items instead of the 5 way navigator button on the bottom of the front. Still, as the device is really to be used for reading books and that mostly involves just having to use the big buttons to turn the pages then you tend not to have to use the menu interface that much anyway. Nonetheless, the UI is a little clunky. You can reduce the clutter on the “home” page by setting up folders to house different genres of books, called “collections” but cannot, unfortunately, have further subdivisions within those collections.

Onto the good things now. I’ve bought about ten books in the last week and all were under £5. These included books that have become popular such as the Stieg Larsson “The Girl With The…” trilogy, all available for under £3 and a couple of books by Jo Nesbo, again available for under £4. Thus, I am forced to admit that one of my main preconceptions about eBooks being as expensive as their printed counterparts is probably largely incorrect. All the books purchased so far have been done via the Kindle itself and the experience was simple. Having the 3G version means I can browse the store when away from home, without wifi, and buy and download books on the spot. I thought this would be useful if I’m on holiday overseas, for example, and felt a sudden urge to buy a new book.

More plus points:

• it’s quite light and comfortable to hold for longer periods. I take it to work and read at lunchtime and take it with me when out and about too as it is relatively pocketable
• you can change the font size willy nilly for easier reading
• the screen is very readable in most light conditions (see below)
• you can also load on pdf format documents and these display surprisingly well to the extent that I have started to use the Kindle at work for showing clients information
• I’ve only charged it the once, on the day I got it and there is still what looks like about 80% charge left after a weeks use
• apparently, if I bought another Kindle through my Amazon account and gave it to my wife then she can read all the books I’ve bought too. Thus, book sharing (which we do with paperbacks) is entirely possible
• there are other features built in such as the browser and the ability to subscribe to “blogs” (although oddly this costs money) and magazines/newspapers too (also paid)
• built in “experimental” features includes the ability to play music and podcasts but I think these are just in the MP3 format (?)
• it is easy to add files by dragging and dropping them via USB connection on both Mac & Windows

Downsides apart from the two already mentioned?

• at times, I feel the Kindle could do with a backlight for the screen. There is an official Kindle case with light attached but it is £50…ouch
• it would be great if the screen was colour but that may well come in a future version
• this is silly but….I miss not being so sure how much of the book is left as you do with a paperback book

Overall though I am very pleased with the Kindle to date. It’s simple to run, has great battery life, a huge selection of available books at decent prices, is low maintenance and has a very readable screen in the majority of situations.

Murray.

3 Comments


Alcatel OT-255 review: a smartphone experience for less than £5?

The Alcatel OT-255 is the cheapest QWERTY keyboarded mobile phone you can buy today. It is, believe it or not, currently selling for £4.95 + a £10 topup which puts it at the bargain basement end of the entire mobile phone market. The Alcatel name does not fill many people who have an understanding of mobile phones with great confidence and with good reason. Alcatel has a revered reputation is certain areas of mobile technology, but when it comes to mobile phones it is a completely different story. I remember joining a company years ago to take control of mobile purchasing. On the first day I sat in a meeting and was told that they would only be purchasing Alcatel phones because they were cheaper. My negotiations concerning the cost of poor reliability, image for the sales reps etc. fell on deaf ears and the orders were placed. I left the company 4 days later and returned to my previous employer.

Ever since those days I have never touched an Alcatel phone, having preferred to spend my time testing and reviewing proper phones that reach out to those of us who want the best possible mobile experience. Alcatel continues to tread the boards of the ultra-budget market and to this day has not seen fit to make phones that are ambitious in terms of the technology held within. So, why am I reviewing the attractively (?) named OT-255? I really do not know, but I have to give it credit for standing out among shelves of sleek silver feature phones and smartphones that can tend to look alike in their general forms. It looks ‘budget’ in almost every way and there is no attempt at hiding the fact, but it does have a certain charm that sets it apart from the crowd.

First impressions

The box is tiny, seriously small, and you would never think that a mobile phone was inside it. To be fair there are few accessories to squeeze in because all you get is a very low quality set of headphones and an AC charger. Both of these use the mini-USB jack on the right-hand side and there are no other openings at all- the back is completely bare and all that remains is a convenience key on the left which brings up a vertical carousel to access apps quicker.

Let’s concentrate on the front because almost nothing is happening elsewhere. The general layout is very similar to many other front facing keyboarded phones; the standard QWERTY keyboard is set below a navigation / selection key and the call start / end keys. The screen sits above all of these and looks kind of strange due to its diminutive size and the larger than average surround which makes it look even smaller.

OK, it’s time to take a look at each aspect of the OT-255 with a list of the specifications to start us off-

Dimensions 100.5 x 58 x 12 mm
Weight 76 g
Display Type TFT, 65K colors
Size 128 x 160 pixels, 1.8 inches
Full QWERTY keyboard
Sound Alert types Vibration; MP3 ringtones
Speakerphone  Yes
Memory Phonebook 500 contacts
Call records Yes
Internal 1.8 MB
Card slot No
Data GPRS Class 10 (4+1/3+2 slots), 32 – 48 kbps
EDGE No
3G No
WLAN No
Bluetooth No
Infrared port No
USB Yes, miniUSB (charging only)
Camera   No
Features Messaging SMS, MMS, Email
Browser WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML
Radio FM radio with RDS
Games 2
Colors Black, Apple Green, Orange
GPS No
Java No
- Fake call
- Organizer
- Voice memo
Standard battery, Lithium 650 mAh
Stand-by Up to 380 h
Talk time Up to 9 h

Features

Screen (3/10)

At just 1.8 inches the screen is obviously very small and the resolution, at just 128 x 160 pixels, is even smaller in comparison to other phones on the market. Below is a representation of how it compares to the iPhone 4’s resolution-

That is a huge difference between the two and even allowing for the size difference, it highlights just how much smartphone screens have moved on. However, let’s give Alcatel a break and presume that they were not aiming to produce a crystal clear viewing experience. The screen just about suffices for email and text messaging, but web browsing is not really possible on a screen this size.

To its credit, it is viewable in many conditions, but don’t expect to be doing too much in very bright conditions and it can glare somewhat at the maximum brightness setting.

General Performance (7/10)

Once it has started up and realised that you have turned it on, it plods along quite satisfactorily. There isn’t a lot for it to do that could be described as tough on memory and that is a good thing because there is only 1.0MB available to the user despite the claim in the specs of 1.8MB.

Camera (0/10)

I didn’t manage to take one photo that was worth saving with the OT-255. Oh I forgot, it hasn’t got a camera.

Voice quality (6/10)

The call quality was better than I expected which isn’t saying much. It produces a deep(ish) tone when held to the ear and the volume was quite adequate for general use. The speakerphone offers a somewhat garish tone which would be expected in a phone that is so small and light.

Media (1/10)

There are some wallpapers included alongside some better than expected ring tones, but with 1.0MB of internal memory and no expansion options you could at most download 1 minute of a song or a few seconds of a video.

Signal (8/10)

There’s no 3G or Wi-Fi here of course, but the signal is surprisingly strong. I have a full signal on Vodafone at home which is something few other smartphones have managed when switched to 2G, iPhone 4 included.

Battery (8/10)

When you think about a 650mAh battery it would be all too easy to presume that the phone will barely get through a half day of use. You then check the quoted battery time and see 380 hours standby and 9 hours talk time and you think that Alcatel has gone mad. However, from my initial tests the quotes seem to be quite accurate which is hugely impressive for such a small battery, no matter how basic the onboard operating system.

Data entry (9/10)

The keyboard is the main attraction of this phone because it sets it apart from the rest of the ultra-budget brigade and it deserves to be. It looks unusable, but it really does work well and I found myself typing away within the first few minutes at a decent clip. All of the punctuation you need is included alongside easy to access symbols and it just feels right. I am hugely impressed by this keyboard.

Software (7/10)

What can you really expect from a smartphone that costs less than £5? How about contacts, text messaging, email (multiple account support),n FM Radio, WAP browsing (yes it really does say ‘WAP’), weather forecasts, world clock, alarms, stopwatch, media, games, calendar, fake call, notes, tasks, calculator, converter and ICE for emergencies.

It’s a decent line-up and one that will give many people all that they need, and more, from a simple mobile phone. The data entry also makes some of these incredibly useful and emailing and text messaging were much more positive experiences than I expected. Of course you cannot not add extra apps and the included games are appalling, but I have to give credit to what is a flexible and complete line-up which belies the current price point of this phone.

Conclusion


The Alcatel OT-255 is not a smartphone, if any of you can tell me what one is I continue to listen, and it is not up to the quality of the most basic mobile phones from the likes of Nokia and Samsung. It is, however, much more functional that I expected and is passable as a backup phone that you could take out when you don’t want to be carrying a £400 piece of modern technology with you. It is incredibly light, the battery lasts forever and it is a more than capable caller and emailer. It is less than £5- none of that makes sense really.

7 Comments

Motorola Defy Review (part two)

Available from Clove for £276.13

The Motorola Defy has proved to be a quirky smartphone for me so far. There is little doubting the practicality built in and the build quality, but how does it stack up against the plethora of Android smart phones that are currently swamping the market?

It is a small phone, despite the 3.7″ screen, and does feel like a throwback  from an earlier time when in the hand. It is very light at just 118 grams and doesn’t feel or look like a smartphone that costs over £250, but I can appreciate the features and innovation included in the design. When you consider your current smartphone use, it is quite possible that you spend a lot of time protecting it; whether it has a screen protector, case or you are just ultra careful, many of the high-end smart phones seem to demand this attention. Price is one factor, but the materials used and sense that they are designed to look good rather than be used during all of your activities are the major issues. Rightly or wrongly, I still treat my iPhone 4 like a baby and am somewhat paranoid about dropping it or scratching it. The Defy takes away all of that paranoia and from the first minute I had no qualms about dropping it in a bag, or even on what was left of the recent snow.

It is built incredibly well and I have to say that Motorola has fulfilled the hype with the materials and design tweaks employed. So, let’s get back to how it performs as a smartphone.

Battery (9/10)

The practicality isn’t just centred around the outside because  the internals are designed to take some punishment as well. I charged the Defy up fully on the first day and it only ran out of juice at the end of the third day. My use was sporadic, but when on standby with some text and email use now and again the battery meter barely moved.

This is the first touch screen smartphone I have used that can handle normal usage with ease and it is not that far from the BlackBerry Bold 9780 in how well the battery handles multiple tasks. I read a review of the Defy the other day that suggested that the battery was a one day charge experience, but I just haven’t experience that at all, and I am usually very hard when it comes to battery power on any phone.

Screen (7/10)

The resolution is impressive and everything within the slightly cluttered Android interface looks as it should. Despite the toughened glass frontage, screen taps were accepted perfectly and the same was true of scrolling. I expected it to perform better in bright sunlight, but the colours wash out a little and it is quite reflective. The reflectivity is the biggest problem so an anti-glare screen protector would be a good move. One other point to note is that the screen takes up so much of the real estate that the flush buttons below it are very close to the bottom of the phone itself. This can make quick use slightly slower than is ideal.

Camera (7/10)

The camera performs very well for stills and video in good lighting outdoors, but does suffer indoors when the lighting is not as natural. The good news is that it focusses and takes a snap almost immediately and is reminiscent of the old Treos in the way it works.

Some examples are below, but as a smartphone snapper it does the job very well. Just don’t expect too much when you are in areas with poor lighting.

I tried to upload a video direct to YouTube from the device (link is here), but for some reason it took forever to process. Hopefully it is now working.

General Performance (8/10)

I was quite impressed by the speed of the Defy and given that it is packing an 800Mhz TI processor alongside 512GB of RAM this is not surprising. Everything moved along nicely and multiple open apps made no dent in the performance either. Even MOTOBLUR ran smoothly which makes a nice change, although there cabe the merest hint of sluggishness at times. It seems as though Motorola has got the balance between battery and processor just right on this one.

Media (8/10)

Sound quality is pretty good through a decent set of headphone, which is obviously not the supplied ones, and it is even better through the external speaker. It is one of those phones that offers an external sound that defies the size of the unit and this is advantageous time and time again.

Video playback is also at a level to suit most users and despite the high resolution doesn’t quid offer the near perfect experience some others offer. However, please don’t think that it is poor because it is far from a low quality mobile video player.

All of the usual media suspects such as YouTube are included and, on the whole, work well with the Android OS.

Data Entry (7/10)

The included keyboard really is not great, particularly in portrait mode, and I struggled a lot on the first day. Swype is included which makes a huge difference and it is this that saved it. The advantage of Android is that you can change various aspects of the input software so there are options to tweak it to your needs. I have to say that with Swype I managed some decent speeds which is testament to how useful this software can be.

Calls and Signal (9/10)

Crystaltalk PLUS is built in which uses two microphones to filter background noise and to improve the overall voice experience. In reality I can’t say I noticed the system working, but I did notice that the actual voice quality was exceptional. I tested it on a few calls with friends and they were more than impressed with the definition of my voice, just as I was with the definition theirs. Throw in a top quality speakerphone and this makes the Defy one of the very best smartphones I have used in terms of voice with only the Galaxy S topping it for clarity.

Signal strength is immense and I managed to grab 3G / HSDPA almost everywhere. The Wi-Fi antenna was even better and offered my 8 local networks. As a comparison, my iPhone 4 offered only 3.

Software (8/10)

Android 2.1 isn’t the latest build, but does feature almost all of the goodness included in the latest version. MOTOBLUR is there to make HTC feel even better about Sense- it offers some nice tweaks, but overall manages to cheapen the Android interface and at times slow it down a little. It’s hardly the end of the world because Android is great, but a vanilla version would top off the phone nicely.

Conclusion (9/10)

The Defy does not stand out in any way when you first pick it up- it is a smartphone that feels like it was built two years ago, but after a few days the goodness starts to shine through. This is an extremely well balanced smartphone; from the battery life to the general performance it all works very well indeed. Throw in the ability to do whatever you want with it and we are left with a smartphone that offers feature phone throw anywhere attitude. That attitude quickly takes you over as all of the worries about what you are doing with your phone quickly disappear. Some smartphone manufacturers talk a lot about how a smartphone can help you live your life, but to really do that you need to have no worries about damaging it. This is a seriously smart phone, in more ways than one, and the price is also highly competitive considering the unique features it comes with.

It may not have all of the super high-end features of the Desire HD, Galaxy S or iPhone 4, but it does have something none of them have- immense practicality.

I’m not going to say what I did to the Defy to test it because it is a review model, but when Clove get it back they won’t even know I took it out of the box…

Comments Off

Motorola Defy Review (part one)

Available from Clove for £276.13

I am a firm believer that smartphones will start to become tougher as time progresses and that this will be one of many battlegrounds that the big players will fight over to grasp yet more customers in the future.

The Motorola Defy is the first consumer smartphone designed to give the user the security of knowing that their phone is safe no matter what they do to it, within reason. Previously, all tough phones have either included very basic technology in a phone the size of a small laptop or they have been designed purely for specific industries, with a price that is out of reach of most people.

The word ‘Defy’ is quite apt when you first pick up the phone because it defies the toughness by looking quite flimsy and dare I say it, cheap. I will go into more detail on the design later, but let’s start with the box and contents-

Motorola Defy
2GB MicroSD Card
Stereo Headset with mic
MicroUSB Data Cable
AC Adapter (UK)
Battery 1540mAh
Supporting Documentation

Pretty standard stuff in the box including a 2GB MicroSD card which is enough to start you off, but most people will want to upgrade to 8GB fairly quickly I would presume. The battery, at 1,540mAh bodes well for some decent power beneath the surface and the rest of the contents are  adequate if a little uninspiring.

Design / First Impressions

As I stated earlier, the Defy offers little indication on first glance that it is a tough phone and indeed, it looks less well built than the high-end smart phones such as the Desire HD or BlackBerry Torch.

A closer look reveals some small tweaks that come together to make the Defy much more practical than almost any other competing smartphone; the headphone socket has a rubber filler that sits in the socket about 3mm to ensure that water or dust cannot enter the workings of the phone through this port. The MicroUSB slot also has a plastic covering that swivels around to cover it when not being used- this particular covering does not appear to be tight and waterproof, but I guess it must be or the slot itself is well protected internally. The battery cover is held in place by a sliding button that once slid pops up the cover immediately. Beneath the cover a pleasant site shows up by way of a battery that fills almost all of the main body.

Reattaching the battery cover takes some force which would normally be a negative, but here you just know there is a reason for it- a water tight seal. Beneath the battery are the SIM and MicroSD slots which is another design trait that some see as a bad thing, but again we know the reason this time.

The on/off and volume buttons are quite stiff and not as easy as on other phones, but (sounding like a broken record here) there is a good reason for this. The only other buttons are the standard menu, home, back and search keys below the screen and these are not physical buttons at all and are completely flush to the screen surface. This makes them difficult to use in the first few minutes, but over time they start to feel better. I am presuming this to be another consequence of the need to make every area as tough as possible. Finally, the only other design feature of note are the exposed screws which serve no particular purpose. I presume them to be there because they look good and add a sense of ‘tough’ to the otherwise plastic design.

I haven’t spent much time playing with the Defy software, but will cover that in part 2. I will also do my best to test Motorola’s claims that it is ‘life proof’, but won’t tell anyone at Clove I am doing that:) Some bold claims are made, especially in the video below-

It does feel small and somewhat reminiscent of smartphones from 2 – 3 years ago, and very light as well. To include a 3.7″ screen which runs at 480 x 854 pixels is an impressive use of space and so far I have to give the Defy a big thumbs up.


7 Comments

HTC Desire HD Review

Available from Clove for £469.99

The HTC Desire HD is probably HTC’s flagship smartphone of the moment, and without doubt its flagship Android phone. The specifications below show why-

1GHz Processor
Google Android 2.2 with HTC Sense Interface
4.3 inch touch screen 480 x 800 resolution
8.0 Megapixel Camera with auto focus and 2 x LED flashlight
1.5GB Internal Storage
Bluetooth 2.1 with FTP/OPP, A2DP, PBAP
WiFi IEEE 802.11 b/g/n
Dolby Mobile and SRS Surround Sound
DLNA Compatible

The numbers above are highly impressive, but specifications alone do not always make a great smartphone. There are countless devices on the market that boast considerable specifications, but which fail to match the numbers, and others with lower specs often punch above their weight and offer a more usable experience. The Desire HD is designed to offer all of the numbers serious smartphone people want and to bring with it usability enhancements that only some phones on the market currently enjoy; the iPhone 4 and Galaxy S are good examples.

In the box

It is all pretty standard, as you can see from the list below, and is typically HTC from the box design to every single accessory. You get what you need, but no extras like a screen protector or case.

HTC Desire HD
Battery
USB Cable
Mains Charger
8GB MicroSD Card
Stereo Headset
Documentation

The battery capacity, at 1230mAh, is a cause for concern when the large 4.3” screen is considered, but let’s not jump the gun just yet. It would also be nice to see a 16GB card bundled because 8GB cards are quite cheap these days, but maybe I am just being greedy now…

Design / Build Quality

Wow! The screen dominates this phone unlike any other I have used. It is gargantuan at 4.3” and brings many benefits with it besides just being bigger than most competing phones. Typing is easier and so is navigating around the operating system, and this on top of the enhanced media experience. The screen is housed in a metal body which is deceptively shallow with a curved shape designed to make the phone feel slimmer in the hand. It isn’t deep at all at just 11.8mm, but each edge must be approximately 7mm so it really does feel like you are holding a huge screen rather than a powerful smartphone- the surround is minimal and the fact that there are no physical buttons on the front adds to this effect, and it truly works from a design, and practicality, point of view.

The quality of the materials used is better than I have seen before from HTC and the subtle buttons and ports make barely a dent in the overall look of the phone. The MicroUSB port is on the bottom which is useful for the future development of desktop cradles, but so is the headphone jack which is unusual. However, it really is the best place for it because you are much less likely to have the headphone wire drooping over the screen when on a call or watching a video. I hadn’t even considered such a placement previously, but it really does work.  The on/off button is on the top over to the left which is slightly tricky for one-handed use and the volume buttons are on the left. Sadly there is no camera key which I presume to be part of trying to keep the outer design as simple as possible.

The back is, as I said earlier, curved and is only broken up by the extended lens of the camera. The dual LED flash sits in its own panel next to the lens and the only other part is the removable section at the bottom which houses the MicroSD and SIM card slots- you have to remove the whole of the bottom section to allow for the MicroUSB and headphone jacks to also be positioned on the outer bottom edge. The battery is, unusually, accessible from the side and simply requires the lifting of one small section of the back cover. It looks and works great, but more than likely will preclude the production of more powerful batteries in the future because the bulk of the back cover is not removable.

That’s about it for the design except to mention that slim silver speaker above the screen and the flush buttons below it. These buttons are larger than normal thanks to the big footprint of the HD and are extremely easy to use once you are familiar enough with them to tap without thinking.

The Desire HD is a quality piece of hardware and it manages to feel good in the hand despite its size- the only quirk I found was that the removable bottom section was not as flush as I would have liked against the top half of the outer cover. I suspect that it is just this phone, but it will be interesting to see if this is repeated on other HD’s.

Screen (8/10)

This is a pretty good screen and any of you who have played with the original HTC HD2 will know the emotions it inspires. Some say that it is too big for a smartphone, but I have to disagree. It has a large footprint, but a quick comparison to three other popular smartphones highlights how efficiently the screen is implemented-

HTC Desire HD-     120.5 X 67 X 11 mm / 157 grams / 4.3″ screen

LG Optimus 7- 125 x 59.8 x 11.5mm / 157 grams / 3.8″ screen

Acer Liquid e- 115 x 62.5 x 12.5mm / 135 grams / 3.5″ screen

Samsung Galaxy S- 122.4 x 64.2 x 9.9 mm / 119 grams / 4.0″ screen

The fact that it is viewable in most conditions and that it is perfectly sensitive when selecting apps, browsing the web and with almost any other activity only helps push it further up in my estimation. In bright sunlight it suffers somewhat and this is where the TFT technology is highlighted- the coating is prone to fingerprints and glare in bright sun which is a shame. The WVGA resolution does not compete with the Retina display on the iPhone 4, but it is still very crisp and the entire interface looks great. I have to say that I would take a larger crisp screen over the smaller super crisp Retina display purely because it offers much more space with which to work and play. The Desire HD screen is one of the best HTC has produced yet. It hits the limit of screen size on a mobile phone and HTC has cleverly built the phone around the screen to make the whole unit as small as is technically possible. It isn’t perfect by any means, but is much better than some other sites would have you believe.

Camera (8/10)

The camera is rated at 8 Megapixels and includes 720p video recording. I believe that a software tweak is needed on the video side because the focus changes were often times so harsh it effected the output. Check out the example below-

The stills side is much better and I had little trouble in quickly capturing decent shots, but a closer inspection on my desktop revealed the small tweaks that would be needed to make the pictures acceptable for blowing up. Having said that, it is by some distance the best camera HTC has produced to date and 99% of users will be more than happy with it. The range of effects within the camera app are useful too and the software is extremely easy to use.

Average light outdoors

Good lighting outdoors

Good lighting indoors

Vintage effect


General Performance (9/10)

If you are going to pit Android 2.2 against a second generation Snapdragon 1GHz processor and 768MB of RAM the experience is likely to be fluid and incredibly fast. It is.

The performance is very smooth and rivals the iPhone and Windows Phone units for sheer delight when tapping and swiping through the OS. Android does not have the same level of human interaction as these operating systems, but this is the best it has felt so far.

Media (8/10)

HTC boasts about the the integrated Dolby Mobile and SRS Surround Sound for video playback, but in all honesty I wouldn’t have noticed the technology when I first played a film through headphones. However, the sound quality is excellent and on a par with any other smartphones I have used in terms of being able to recreate the layers good music deserves. In movies, the marriage of sound and the immersive screen is breathtaking at times.

The only reason it loses a point is because the external speaker is slightly tinny. It is nowhere near as bad as the one on the Desire Z, but it could be deeper in the bass area. I am presuming that this is down to the shallow depth of the design and thus a smaller speaker housing has had to be employed.

Call / Signal Quality (8/10)

Call quality to the ear is very good indeed and I was more than impressed by the loudness and the deep quality in reproducing voices. On the external speaker it is not so loud and suffers slightly from the aforementioned point surrounding the external speaker.

Signal quality is excellent on the phone side and I achieved a consistent HSDPA signal in places that I could not even grab with Desire Z. Strangely, the Wi-Fi signal seems to be quite weak and the signal bars dropped quickly as I moved more than 20 feet from my router. I need to do some more testing, but I haven’t experienced this with other smartphones which all tend to keep a full signal anywhere in my house.

Battery (6-7/10)

This is a difficult one because the Desire HD will get through a whole day if you are not using the power hungry features. However, start using that screen to its fullest and a charge will be needed at some point during the afternoon. The marriage of a 4.3” screen and a 1230mAh battery don’t sound good on paper, and the reality is that it does struggle at times. As I said earlier you won’t be seeing larger replacement batteries available so a spare would be a good option to take up. Most very large screened devices suffer in this area, but HTC has also managed to limit the battery options as well which is not the best idea.

Further testing has revealed that it is better than I first thought, but will still struggle for power users. I now believe that I could get a day out of this phone under my normal usage patterns.

Data Input (8/10)

The large screen helps a lot in terms of quick data entry on a touch screen and the spell correction is on the whole quite accurate. It is flaky at times, but then so are all touch screen smartphone correctors so all in all the experience is positive. In landscape it is very good and the extra size of the HD works better for me because I have long fingers and this makes it feel more natural than a smaller phone in landscape mode.

Software (9/10)

I have complained before about the vast number of apps and features that are bundled with Android, and in many way this phone is no different, but it comes back to the screen again. Somehow it all feels less crowded and HTC has included useful apps that the users will genuinely need on a day to day basis. None of the basics are missing and everything from turn-by-turn navigation to eBook reading is included. eBooks look great on the Kindle app and the eReading experience is yet again greatly enhanced by the larger screen.

Quick Lookup is an excellent app which offers the ability to search once and see the results in Wikipedia, Google, YouTube, Google Translate and Google Dictionary- it quickly became my default app for research.

Car Panel is just a fancy looking shortcut windows to various GPS related features, but the Nearby feature is especially useful. You can also get to Footprints through it which remains one of the most pleasing apps that HTC has implemented to date- it doesn’t do a great deal, but could come in handy time and time again.

The Android Market gets better every time I look at it and a quick search through the free and paid for titles shows that many of the mainstays of the iTunes App Store are now present. It isn’t quite as polished as the App Store, but a small amount of familiarity will soon make it an easy to navigate and complete resource to you.

At times it felt like I was typing on a mini tablet and the simple Calculator app highlighted that more than anything else. The keys are huge and it was all so easy to use for when the time comes (back to the screen size again).

There is so much to cover in terms of the operating system and the apps that I would be here all day if I attempted to do so. What I can say is that Android is growing on me and that it feels more complete as time goes by. I cannot think of another smartphone platform that offers so much out of the box and as the third party offerings improve, it will start to compete with the very best.

Conclusion

This is a truly excellent smartphone that proves that a 4.3” screen is possible on a phone that is still portable enough to use every day. The build quality and design are exceptional and the entire experience is only slightly marred by the battery performance. It seems that every smartphone has a flaw, and the battery is the weak area, but I am still convinced that most people will get though a day’s use quite happily.

It is one of the best smartphones I have used and the first to genuinely make me question my iPhone 4 ownership, but the battery is the one thing that plays on my mind. Having said that, the iPhone is hardly a powerhouse when it comes to battery performance. If you are happy to buy a spare battery or if your daily use is ‘normal’ then I would 100% recommend this phone- it is brilliant in so many ways and one more step up the ladder to smartphone perfection.


4 Comments

LG Optimus 7 (E900) Review

Available to pre-order from Clove for £446.50

* Windows Phone 7
* LG Augmented Reality Camera
* Enhanced Social Networking
* 3.8” WVGA display
* Super fast 3G connectivity
* DLNA compatibility
* High Definition video recording
* WiFi 802.11b/g/n

The splurge of Windows Phone devices hitting the market is immense and it would be true to say that it is not always easy to tell them apart. I was lucky enough to get my hands on an LG Optimus 7 and this has given me a good look at the hardware that will be carrying the latest smartphone OS and of course the OS itself.

The Optimus 7 is a rather bland looking phone when you first look at it with few twists and turns to make you admire the design. It’s all screen on the front and all battery cover on the back, with very little in between to break up the slab-like appearance. The three buttons below the screen, back, home screen and search are the only parts that make it look like a phone and I guess that this is not a bad thing. The back cover is metal which adds a touch of quality to the feel and the camera surround adds even more thanks to its brushed silver exterior. The volume buttons are top left and the camera button bottom right. Strangely the sync / charge jack is top right which is not the best place for it, but the 3.5mm headphone jack and on / off button are where they should be on the top.

Overall I like the understated design of the Optimus 7 and the better than average build quality, but suspect that those of you who prefer more styling in a phone will look to the likes of HTC for a Windows Phone. Personally, I will always go for the best I can find and styling rarely comes into it as a major buying factor.

Hardware

Obviously this is a new Windows Phone experience for me and so I will try to keep part one to just the hardware. Software is always important when considering hardware quality though because the two need to work together to create a smartphone that achieves the right balance. It needs to have enough power to move the software along at the right pace, but also be efficient enough to keep the battery alive for at least a day. There is little doubt in my mind that the Optimus is powerful enough to cope with the operating system and there have been no slow downs, freezes or any unusual other behaviour to cause me concern. It just oozes smoothness in operation and it took me a few days to realise just how smooth it is. If you are familiar with iOS, this is what it feels like. Android is close to iOS in the smooth department, but it seems as though Windows Phone is even closer and in reality is every bit as smooth as iOS. It is a difficult thing to describe, but when you use a smartphone that hides most of the menus and the technology you know how it feels to use, and it feels good.

The camera is at odds with the rest of the hardware because I struggled to take snaps of the quality I would expect from a 5 Megapixel model. It is extremely quick to take the photos, but at no point did I fully grasp it to the point that the resultant photos were as good as competing cameras. In good light and usually outdoors, the snaps were OK, but indoors and on occasions when the flash is required things started to go wrong. The flash overpowered many shots to the point that nothing came out and so some adjustment would be useful here. The camera has potential, but even with software updates I believe that it will merely reach the level of average at best. I expected the video recorder to be better as well considering it is rated at 720p, but it seriously could be a lot better.

On the good side, the screen is superb with excellent performance in all conditions and a featherlight touch enough to achieve the desired response from a fingertip. It also has a wide viewing angle, from all side, and the 800 x 480 resolution works well as it should with Windows Phone. Battery life is much better than I expected even for a 1500mAh power pack. I have been using the phone on and off for 3 days so far and it is still just under half way on the battery meter. On a harder day I still had 40% left which suggests that a day’s use will not be a problem, but 2 may be out of the question if you are a power user. This is standard for most smartphones with large touch screens these days so I can’t really complain.

The call quality is very good and so is the speakerphone. I would put it on a par with the BlackBerry Torch in this regard which is an impressive feat considering how good BlackBerry’s are in this area. The software that drives the phone feature is not as intuitive as it should be though and did take some time to get used to.

There are some highlights hidden within the phone such as DNLA connectivity which requires ownership of a compatible TV and the augmented reality feature built into the camera is a decent option to have, even if a plethora of apps will follow that can do this as well.

What strikes me more than anything about the Optimus 7 hardware is that you simply don’t notice it. It feels like a vehicle to carry Windows Phone 7 and nothing more. Is this a bad thing? Not at all because the way it works it what counts- I don’t spend half my time looking under the desk at my Mac Mini. It just sits there out of sight doing what I need it to do, to power Mac OS. The Optimus 7 powers Windows Phone almost perfectly and the only change I would make would be to improve the camera, but as far as the hardware goes it is a very capable performer. Come back Monday for a look at the all important software, the newest smartphone operating system on the market.

3 Comments

Nokia N8 Review

Available from Clove for £364.25

I normally write two part reviews for new smartphones, but in the case of the Nokia N8 I will keep things to just one. The reasons, as you will see, are largely based around the software onboard and not the hardware.

In the box

The box is a very unusual shape, being flat and much larger than the normal cube style smartphone boxes we are used to seeing. Inside you get the following-

* Nokia N8 mobile computer
* Nokia Battery BL-4D
* Nokia Connectivity Cable CA-179
* Nokia Stereo Headset WH-701
* Nokia Compact Travel Charger AC-15
* Nokia Adapter Cable for HDMI CA-156
* Nokia Adapter Cable for USB OTG CA-157
* Nokia Stylus SU-36 (selected markets only)
* Quick start guide

I have to say that I was marginally impressed with the headset this time. Nokia has a habit of bundling extremely poor quality headsets, but has made an effort here to include various ear buds and remote controls on the wire- it still isn’t going to replace your favourite pair of headphones, but is a turn in the right direction.

The inclusion of an HDMI adaptor is also welcome and the entire bundle feels complete and of a quality expected in a high-end smartphone. Overall the unboxing and package contents get the experience off to a good start.

Design / Build Quality

The N8 feels almost industrial in design with a nice cold metal housing that offers a sense of good built. The tapered top and bottom fool the user into thinking that the phone is smaller than it really is and it does have the look of a 2010 smartphone. The screen is clear, even with some washout in bright sunlight, and it all goes together very nicely. The main Symbian button on the bottom left is slightly tricky to use at first because of the tapers and the fact it is placed so near the bottom edge. I found myself using it two-handed when needing to use this button.

The other buttons are perfectly placed with secure covers for the SIM and card and expansion card slots and a highly usable, but not too easy to accidentally hit, camera button. The volume keys are, unusually, on the right and the charging / sync port on the lower left.

Everything about this phone screams quality from the moment you pick it up and Nokia has certainly does an excellent job with the hardware, and the consideration given to how the owner will want to use it.

Camera

The camera is, as expected, superb in every detail. I wouldn’t say that it is the easiest to use or that it completely fulfils the need for a ‘snap and go’ smartphone camera, but it beats any other smartphone camera on the market today for quality of output. I am not an adept snapper and tend to view smartphone cameras as a nice to have feature that can prove useful from time to time, but the iPhone 4 changed my view somewhat and is now my main camera. The Nokia N8 camera should be considered as a compact camera in its own right and when you factor that thought it, the value of the N8 starts to feel even higher.

Here are a couple of example photos below, but for a full overview check out part 2 of Steve Litchfield’s excellent review of the Nokia N8 which highlights, in great detail, how well the N8 camera performs.

Standard shot- no flash

With flash at night (slightly washed out)

Software

So, the hardware is great, the camera is stellar and now straight back down to earth courtesy of Symbian^3.

The debates and arguments continue over which is the best smartphone in the market and why iOS is better than Android, why Symbian is dying etc. etc., but it seems that Symbian^3 polarises opinion to an even greater degree.

Here is a comment posted on All About Symbian by Fradget- “I think a lot of the dismissive reviews calling Symbian^3 unusable are the most ignorant rants I’ve heard in years. The “Battle against Symbian” has become political and has to do with defending American national interests. There’s a huge ecosystem that depends on the success of those American operating systems’ continued success. Giving up even an inch of that market share to Symbian which already dominates the global market is just too much of a threat. The Nokia bashing going on is the definition of insecurity.

What’s disgusting is when blogs outside the US simply parrot the views of these biased Americans without even giving it any thought.”

If I may take some of those points before I discuss Symbian^3- disclaimer: PDA-247 is not an American site and I don’t do politics at all when it comes to smartphones. When I review a phone I consider it on its own merits and will at times compare it to others phones to see how well it stacks up against the competition.

“I think a lot of the dismissive reviews calling Symbian^3 unusable are the most ignorant rants I’ve heard in years.”

Well, get used to it. I have had in my possesion for the last week the N8, a Bold 9780, an LG-E900, an HTC Desire Z and an iPhone 4. Symbian^3 is by far the most complicated to use OS of the bunch and is at times unusable unless you are a hardened Symbian user who is completely familiar with the way the system works. It is not even close to defendable and in direct comparisons to iOS, Android, Windows Phone and even BlackBerry OS 6 it feels like an OS from 3 or 4 years back.

“What’s disgusting is when blogs outside the US simply parrot the views of these biased Americans without even giving it any thought.”

When I review a new smartphone I consider how new smartphone users will adapt to it as well as hardened smartphone buyers. Remember that these phones are now the models that fill the windows of mobile phone shops across the country- smartphones drive the industry and feature phones are hidden inside on shelves should someone only want the basics. Consumers go out and buy these phones and when I consider how they will view Symbian^3 in the first few days of ownership, it takes me back to the experiences of friends who bought Windows Mobile devices a few years back. They were complicated, unnatural to use and offered little consideration to how a person would actually use the phone- that’s how Symbian^3 still feels to me.

There are stacks of apps included in the OS- BBC iPlayer, Photo Editor, Video Editor, Social Networks, Here and Now, You Tube, Radio, QuickOffice, Dictionary, Adobe PDF, Calculator, FM Transmit, My Nokia, Ovi Sync, SW Update, Web TV, Ovi Store and the list goes on and on. Some of these apps are very useful, and indeed work brilliantly, but I felt like I had borrowed the phone from someone else who had loaded lots of random stuff on there before I got hold of it, someone who doesn’t know how to logically layout apps. This is, in some ways, similar to how Android is presented to new users, but to an even higher degree.

As I traversed the multitude of menus which still exist in the OS, I realised that little has changed in the way that Symbian behaves and this is disappointing in a world where everyone else is starting to realise that computing should be less complicated and that the key to success is in hiding the technical side and making things easier for the user. I admit that I got to the point where I could not persist and write any more about it because I got so frustrated, and I am more than familiar with how smartphones work. I don’t even want to consider how newbies would feel using this phone.

Conclusion

Nokia must spend millions creating excellent hardware and world beating cameras. The N8 is a perfect example of that philosophy. The time has come, however, to realise that Symbian is not going to be retrievable to the point that it can compete with the rest. The N8 feels like someone has spent two years building an Aston Martin and then stuck a Vauxhall Corsa interior inside- the hardware is wonderful, the OS is shocking.

In all my years reviewing phones I have never come across a device that excels so much in one area and fails so badly in the other, but the N8 is that phone. No matter what Nokia does in the future with the hardware it needs to look elsewhere for a platform. Samsung created the Samsung Wave on the back of Bada OS and that is a brilliant smartphone and many others are doing the same using Android- maybe the time has come for Nokia to realise that it is at the top of the pile when it comes to hardware and just concentrate on that side. Stick any other OS in the N8 and it would be a fantastic smartphone, but Symbian^3 manages to take away all of the goodness and confine it to the ‘could have been great’ pile of which many have trodden before.


6 Comments

BlackBerry Bold 9780 review (part two)

Available from Clove for £393.63

I am not going to do my usual and break down each feature of the Bold 9780 this time because many of them are so similar to the Bold 9700 (review here), particular in terms of hardware. I will, however, look at the main differences and try to work out if this is a worthy upgrade from the original.

As I said in part one, RIM has not tinkered with the best bits of the 9700, but tried to enhance where possible and make a smartphone that can carry off OS6 to a whole new audience. The Torch didn’t quite handle the new OS as I would have hoped, but the 9780 has proved that it is a much better upgrade than I originally thought. Given that it is as fast as you can hope for there are no performance issues at all; at no point have I suffered any slow downs or even the merest hint of the phone working hard to do what I need it to, often times multiple things at once. The generous amount of memory onboard offers more security than you could need as well and the days of worrying about your BlackBerry needing a battery pull are hopefully gone forever. You could store thousands of emails, contacts, calendar entries and whatever else you want without need to worry, but apps still need to go into internal memory as well so be careful not to overdo it.

The other main hardware improvement is the camera which is now rated at 5 Megapixels and it is a big improvement in my opinion. It is ‘very’ quick in use and the snaps, on the whole, came out much better than I expected. There are numerous scene modes built in which make a genuine difference in the right circumstances; Auto, Face Detection, Portrait, Sports, Landscape, Party, Close-Up,Snow, Beach, Night and Text. That should cover most of your needs, but the auto mode worked fine all of the time for me, here are some examples-

Standard Photo

Full Zoom

Flash at Night


Video recording is not too bad, but not up to the level you would expect from a 5 Megapixel camera. It is improved, but personally I would like to see a little more quality in the image and sound departments here. I took the following before I brushed my daughter’s hair for school in case you thought I would send her to school like that…

The other main difference is of course the inclusion of BlackBerry OS 6 which didn’t impress me immensely on the BlackBerry Torch. When I look back now I can see that the hardware was largely to blame for my negative perception. You would think that OS 6 was designed for a touch screen world, but strangely it seems to work better on a non touch device like the 9780. Besides the super smooth performance, everything started to fall into place which may or may not be a good thing.

OS 6 is very similar to OS 5 in the way it works and all OS 5 users will be immediately familiar with the way the new OS works. This demonstrates the structurally small changes that OS 6 has brought in and the realisation that the core BlackBerry OS is actually very well suited to non touch and a keyboard. The 9780 has proved to me that OS 6 is an improvement over OS 5, but it keeps all of the goodness of the original.

The browser is much improved, but sadly it still lags behind the competition in almost every way. The stock browsers in iOS, Android, Symbian and Windows Phone are easier to use and are closer to a mini desktop experience where as the BlackBerry browser still has more than a feel of mobile about it. The calendar and most of the other core apps have undergone refreshes, but Memo for example remains almost identical to the original, which is how it works best. To sum up, I see OS 6 as a small step upwards for BlackBerry and certainly nothing revolutionary is happening here. That is not a bad thing because the BlackBerry OS is still by far the best, in my opinion, for getting things done. For all of the advancements shows in competing operating systems, sometimes what works should stay as it is.

Conclusion

The Bold 9780 is never going to set the world alight because it builds on tried and tested hardware and software, and does not differentiate itself much at all. However, when I consider what it is improving on any improvement at all is a blessing because the Bold 9700 was just so damn good in the first place.

What we want our smartphones to do is a very different question than what we need them to do and the 9780 ticks almost every box. When I consider needs I think of the following-

Quick and accurate data entry- check.

Long battery life- check.

Viewable screen in all brightness conditions- check.

Fast performance and reliability- check.

Clear call quality and loud / clear speakerphone- check.

A range of apps that caters for all of my needs- check.

The Bold 9780 covers all of the above with ease and that cannot be said for any other competing smartphone. I understand if you think the iPhone 4 or Desire Z or whatever other phone is better, but that does not discount the fact that only a phone like the Bold 9780 is capable of succeeding for every fundamental function that busy people need.

Pound for pound, this is the best smartphone available today. It may not be exciting, it may not have all of the apps available for other smartphones, but it is as close to perfect as a ‘getting things done’ smartphone needs to be.


Comments Off

BlackBerry Bold 9780 review (part one)

Available from Clove for £393.63

The BlackBerry Bold 9700 is one of my favourite smartphones for a number of reasons (review here) and the BlackBerry Torch managed to remove many of those reasons and give OS 6 a platform that was not as good as the theory suggested it would be.

The BlackBerry Bold 9700 has, don’t hold your breath, seriously impressive battery life, a great screen that is viewable in all conditions, the best keyboard of any smartphone on the market, phenomenal speed, lots of power and a form factor that is unrivalled in its durability and practicality. The BlackBerry Torch has some of the above traits such as a decent screen and serious speed, but the battery isn’t quite at Bold levels and the keyboard took a serious turn for the worse once it was morphed into a slider.

The BlackBerry Bold 9780 could be seen as a mixture of the 9700 and Torch; it retains the glorious form factor of the 9700 and OS 6 from the Torch, but loses almost every other Torch trait in favour of squeezing OS 6 into a more up to date 9700- a good move.


RIM often gets criticised for making phones that are too similar to the previous model, and that argument could certainly be aired with the Bold 9780, but some things do not need to change. The design, as I said earlier, is ultra practical and stylish in the most understated of ways. I have reviewed and tested many, many smartphones, but to date the Bold 9700 / 9780 design is still the smartphone I look at and consider to be the pinnacle of design for a busy person in 2010.

In the box

* BlackBerry Bold 9780
* Battery
* 2GB MicroSD Card
* Mains Adaptor
* USB Cable
* Headset
* Pocket Case
* Documentation

It’s all pretty standard, but the return of a case is most welcome. It is a good quality one as well and the quality and smell, of leather, will likely mean that you do not need to go out and purchase a separate form of protection. The inclusion of a 2GB MicroSD card feels a little stingy for a £400 phone and of course the headset could be better.

The battery is a whopping 1500mAh which immediately leads me to expect good things in the power area and the only other comment that is needed concerning the extras is the inclusion of CD software- do we really need to see CDs bundled with phones when everyone has internet access?

Overall though, I am more than happy with the contents and they offer more than enough to get any user up and running without needing to buy extras.

First Impressions

It’s a BlackBerry Bold. I knew it would look and feel good and everything is exactly as I expected. From the fancy leather back cover to the glorious keyboard all of the good stuff remains and there are few disappointments so far. There is something special about a well made BlackBerry ‘without’ a touch screen and from a hardware point of view I simply cannot complain at all.

You may be thinking that this is just a slightly upgraded Bold 9700, but there are numerous improvements-

The camera is 5 Megapixels compared to 3.2 Megapixels in the 9700 and now includes continuous autofocus.

Internal RAM has been pushed up to 512MB which is much more than the OS could ever need- nice to see an overuse of RAM rather than the bare minimum.

A2DP is included and that is it from a hardware point of view apart from a slight increase in size and weight which is not really noticeable in day to day use-

Bold 9700: 122 grams, 109x60x14.1mm

Bold 9780: 136 grams, 114x66x15mm

Of course the main addition is BlackBerry OS6 which didn’t turn out so well in my BlackBerry Torch review. Here’s a quote- “If I ignore the hardware of the Torch and just look at OS 6 it is without doubt better than OS 5. However, it is still OS5 in a new set of clothes. OS 5 is still, in my opinion, the best smartphone OS for getting things done and for communicating with others; it is quicker than any other platform, it is very stable and crucially it presents your calendar, contacts and everything else in a format that is almost entirely text based. There are few fancy graphics and the menus to get in the way, and it just works. With OS 6 you still get an implementation that is visually simple to work with, but with some added aesthetics that do little more than make it look more modern. Every part of an interface needs to be implemented for a reason and I am not convinced that OS 6 doesn’t just have a lot of fancy graphics added just to look like the rest.

The calendar is a good example where the interface has been overhauled and retained the crispness of the OS 5 calendar view. It does look better, but this then leads me ask two questions. Is OS 6 little more than a graphical refresh of OS 5, thus adding little extra value, or is it an enhancement that takes away the simplicity of the original? I believe it to be the first and am left feeling somewhat underwhelmed by this OS upgrade.”

As you can see I wasn’t particularly impressed with OS 6 on the Torch, but is it any better on the 9780? Has the new OS ruined a near perfect piece of phone hardware or has the 9780 proved that OS 6 is a very capable mobile OS? Come back tomorrow to find out.

Comments Off